Instead of a symbolic annotation, which shows you in general terms how much better a recommended variation is, the numerical evaluation will show you exactly how your move and the recommended line differ. This traditional numerical analysis is, in many ways, a much more precise method of analysis in that it will show you the exact (down to 1/100th of a pawn) difference between the move you made and the recommended move that the chess engine determines to be better.
This is the traditional mode of displaying chess analysis it's been around ever since the first commercial PC chess software made its appearance in the 1980's.
"Blundercheck" will analyze your games and show where you (and your opponent) made mistakes but its output is in numerical rather than verbal form. A second analysis form is called "Blundercheck" and is similar in many ways to the "Full Analysis" function. This feature allows you to analyze your games and will provide some general information on where you may have gone wrong in your play.
(Part Two) by Steve Lopez In the first article of this series we examined the "Full Analysis" feature in the ChessBase ChessProgram interface (used by Fritz, Hiarcs, Rybka, Junior, and Shredder ). This "Blundercheck" analysis option will be explained in the second article of this series. Mega Database with 8.Now that we know how the "Full analysis" option works in the Chess Program interface, we'll examine a way to "fine tune" the analysis and get even more specific information, albeit in numerical rather than verbal form.Subjects Sagar deals with – click on the time stamps to jump to the section you wish to view: In almost three hours (!), Sagar Shah teaches us all the features, answers questions from his viewers and writes a PowerPoint guideline so you will never forget what you learned in this video.
Once you know how to use all the functions as well as Sagar, you will profit from them just like he does. IM Sagar Shah works with ChessBase and the Mega Database every single day.